如题。投票结束后，柏林爱乐马上公佈结果。

另，拉特尔已在3月3日和伦敦交响乐团签约，将接替Valery Gergiev，成为下一任的音乐总监。

请各位兄台，踊跃提名候选人。版主能否对此举行有奖竞猜？

谢谢。

大熊、杜达梅尔？

大熊、杜达梅尔？
蓝色的心跳 发表于 2015-3-4 18:59

希望这两位都不是！

虽然柏林爱乐还是世界第一流的乐团，但总觉得没有卡拉扬时期的辉煌了。谁能超越卡皇呢？想不出谁能胜任。我是希望能在德奥里产生。

独立音乐评论人诺曼·莱布雷希特（Norman Lebrecht）是音乐界著名的“大嘴”，给人的感觉就像是个老愤青。不过，他并非把这种作风作为他的包装，他确实是以他对整个行业的熟悉和独特的眼光，看到问题的关键。

对于柏林爱乐五月十一日的投票，他如是说：
I assess the likely outcome of the May 11 vote for the next conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic.

For the first time in the orchestra’s history, the choice is not clear-cut or binary. In the past, it was Furtwängler or Walter, Maazel or Abbado, Barenboim or Rattle. This time, there are several names in contention and a perplexing lack of consensus as to what the orchestra expects from its next leader. It is no longer enough just to be the best orchestra. There is a distinct possibility that Berlin could fail to achieve a result in May.

It is not inconceivable that, after the vote, the Berlin Philharmonic could go from one front-runner to the next and be rejected by both.

This orchestra cannot afford to elect second-best. It must pick a convincing figurehead or risk losing its seat at the top table where German culture is defined. There is nowhere to hide. The deadline is mid-May. Between now and then, the backroom conversation will intensify. At stake is the destiny of the best orchestra in the world, an orchestra that suddenly appears painfully unsure of itself. Intriguing? I should say.

独立音乐评论人诺曼·莱布雷希特（Norman Lebrecht）是音乐界著名的“大嘴”，给人的感觉就像是个老愤青。不 ...
Billchen 发表于 2015-3-5 07:19

说得好。
放眼眼下活着的一流指挥，比老卡以前的大师们，差得多了。
无疑，柏林爱乐继续式微，能选出次优的音乐总监，保持德奥音乐传统就是幸事了。

大熊、杜大妹、尼尔森斯都有可能，雅尼克据说也在候选名单上

我当然支持大熊，表忘了大熊是柏林人哦，其深得柏林爱乐团员的喜爱。不过听过几场大熊带柏林爱乐的风衣录音，似乎还不太合拍，和他带维也纳爱乐那些录音一样，非常别扭。如果他入主柏林的话，可能需要点时间来融合，要达到以前他带英国爱乐、慕尼黑爱乐的水平，其实并不容易，貌似他目前在德累斯顿还尚未完全完成任务。当然他的上海大剧院现场，部分乐章、段落水准直指老前辈们。

杜大妹的全球票房仍然不愧当红炸子鸡的名头，只是他来带柏林爱乐，会不会走得比拉特还远？他的德奥作品和民族乐派作品比还是有些差距的，艺术深度这块是他最大的软肋。但他毕竟是阿巴多和拉特共同的学生、一手拉红的人，DG的宠儿（甚至专门为他发行黑胶），从背景来说，杜大妹的竞争力最强。

尼尔森斯目前是欧洲的大红人，葱丝的得意弟子。不知他取代大熊成为拜罗伊特的宠儿，到底是他老师（八卦一下，葱丝和他长得有点那个。。。像啊，看看小尼的成长轨迹。。。）的功劳呢？还是执掌音乐节的两位瓦格纳姐妹其中哪位看上了这枚小鲜肉？看过两枚他的音乐会录影，感觉离他老师还是有点差距，况且德奥作品也不是葱丝的菜。但他已在琉森攻城略地，占据了拜罗伊特和琉森两块欧洲音乐的高峰，再夺柏林似乎也不是那么难了。

雅尼克在东艺的演出我看过，非常棒。东艺的合同签的是鹿特丹和俄国姐夫，来的却是雅尼克，姐夫跳槽去LSO了（现在又跳去慕尼黑了，拉特去LSO，贵圈好乱~~~）。这小伙能够迅速适应乐团，带出一场精彩的音乐会，可见实力不俗。目前他在费城当音乐总监，到了选帝候级别了，很可能会成为黑马。

以哈丁为代表的其他小年轻估计机会不大（哈丁居然连他师父的琉森阵地都输给葱丝党），大叔爷爷们也不敢去趟这趟浑水，老巴伦上回都错过，这次只能叹息了。

国外的乐迷想到了谁。。。

Bychkov is terribly underrated and a very fine conductor. His recordings with Berlin in the eighties on Philips Classics (Shostakovich 5 and Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker) are terrific. I also thought he’d have a great chance at being Chief Conductor of the Concertgebouw before they announced Gatti, but I sadly doubt that Berlin will consider him if they can get someone like Jansons in the short term or Thielemann for the long.

Nevertheless, Maestro Bychkov is going to conduct Alpine Symphony with the L.A. Philharmonic this coming fall and I’m really looking forward to the performance (especially after seeing the clip of him conducting it with Berlin).

卡拉扬在世时，曾有人问他接班人的问题。老卡想了想，说出两个名字：朱利尼，毕许科夫。

毕许可夫来过上海几次，听过他的音乐会。。。

我当然支持大熊，表忘了大熊是柏林人哦，其深得柏林爱乐团员的喜爱。不过听过几场大熊带柏林爱乐的风衣录音，似乎还不太合拍，和他带维也纳爱乐那些录音一样，非常别扭。
scfan 发表于 2015-3-5 10:02

能否推荐点大熊最近几年的好录音？

能否推荐点大熊最近几年的好录音？
Rozinante 发表于 2015-3-5 14:24

这个真难倒我了，早年英国爱乐的贝五贝七那个里程碑式的高度，似乎现在很难全面达到，当然那个时期的舒曼就弱点，话说老一辈里能弄好舒曼的也屈指可数。中期和慕尼黑爱乐的几枚录音，DG发的勃一、布五我觉得不错，C major发的布四、布七也很好。

拜罗伊特现场录音尚未研究，维也纳爱乐的音乐会现场基本没感觉。

进入德累斯顿后，单从录音讲，也未找到感觉，要不是听了他上海大剧院的现场勃一布七，还以为他已江郎才尽了呢。那套新的勃交全集，实在不如他的上海现场。DG发行他和波利尼的勃拉姆斯两部钢琴更是个杯具，完全不搭调的演出。

我觉得，不说全面，大熊多少还是有些接近前辈水准的想法，但乐团需要完全融合才能发挥，目前对德累斯顿的掌控还达不到他前两个乐团的水准，如果到柏林爱乐可能融合更难，参见他在维也纳那些奇奇怪怪的演出。利好在于，据说柏林的乐手大多很崇拜他，假以时日，说不定能成大师。

这个真难倒我了，早年英国爱乐的贝五贝七那个里程碑式的高度，似乎现在很难全面达到，当然那个时期的舒 ...
scfan 发表于 2015-3-5 14:52

好吧，待我听听他跟爱乐和慕尼黑的录音。直觉上柏林可能比德雷斯顿更适合他一点，因为我觉得德雷斯顿那种风格不适合下手太重的指挥。

说起德奥，Welser-Most好像根本没人提？这人好像很少跟柏林爱乐合作吧？

在新闻发佈会上，莱布雷希特向柏林爱乐提了“三个问题”:
I put three questions to the orchestra’s co-chairmen,  Peter Riegelbauer and Ulrich Knörzer as they faced the press in Berlin. Slipped Disc’s questions:
1 Can you confirm no women are being considered? If not, why not?
2 A simple majority will be enough, right? If the orch splits 62-61, is there a plan for accommodating the ‘loser’?
3 All candidates will have given prior agreement to being considered. If the first-choice candidate declines the post, will the players turn to the one with the next highest votes?

Berlin Phil replies below.
1.“The first round of the election is open to any living conductor (female or male). If the first round of election (on 11th May) will have no result, there will be a shortlist created for the second round on the basis of the results from the first round. We don’t know yet, how many people will be in this list (depends on the number of votes).”
2.“There will be 124 musicians with tenure eligible to vote. The new Artistic Director must have a clear majority in order to be considered elected. We will not announce exact figures either prior to or following the election.”
3. “The newly elected Artistic Director will be informed of her or his election immediately after the votes are counted and may then accept or decline the election. Should the person chosen decline the election, subsequent action (further voting or fixing a date for a new election) must be agreed upon in the orchestra assembly. No list of potential candidates for the position of Artistic Director (a so-called shortlist) will be drawn up before 11 May 2015, and no one will be called/asked whether she or he is available as a candidate prior to the election.”

能从这三个问题里，嗅出点什么？