|
我这是听David兄说的,因为他有天蝎星。
从盆架和振膜推断,我以前一直以为天蝎星使用的是C-Quenze系 ...
167 发表于 2010-12-7 22:40
对于FLEXUNITS 和C-QUENZE 的区别,很想找到可靠的东西来认识一下.因为都是"据某某说,听说.....",不知道167兄从哪儿得知两者的磁路不同.本着这个问题,向PER SKAANING 咨询了一下.
首先,官方的网站上有说明:1 What is the difference between Flexunits and the C-Quenze drivers? The main difference is that C-Quenze uses a solid cast frame, opposed to the bolted together frame in Flexunits. All other materials used are of the same high quality. The cones used in the C-Quenze drivers, have been refined to a broader response with less pronounced breakups.
那么是不是除了盆架的不同还有小的不同吗(相对那个main difference )?对此问了一下AT 的Skaaning先生,感谢他在迎接圣诞的忙碌中给了点答复:
from Sigh ,
in addition ,what 's the differences between Flexunits and c-quenze in magnet motor?
kind regards .
from Per ,
There is no difference regarding sound or choice of material. The only difference is the basket. If you get the C-Quenze driver with Flexunits cone, the driver plays just the same. We can even deliver the C-Quenze driver with a 2 mm gasket, making the driver to fit in the same hole as the Flexunits. Flexunits basket is 8 mm high at the mounting surface and the C-Quenze is 6 mm. If you get the C-Quenze drivers with Flexunits cone, nobody will be able to see or hear the difference, once the driver is mounted in the cabinet.
We can mount any magnet from Flexunits on the C-Quenze drivers.
Best regards - Per
真好笑,AT可以大挪移,看来F和C 的次要的不同(相对于main difference )是锥盆了.如果是锥盆一样,下面的框架和磁马达分别是C-QUENZE 和FLEXUNITS , PER 说没有人能分辨出来的.如果真有人能分辨出来,估计比PER 本人要高明.
www.flexunits.com
PThink before you print! Save energy and paper
|
|