极品人生

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
极品人生 主讨论区 器材讨论 › 查看主题

82913

查看

434

回复
返回列表
楼主: 自文

277#
发表于 2016-4-18 15:52:35 | 只看该作者
无限大的障板-----密闭箱(低频太少)--------倒相箱(假低频)。

点评

密闭箱理论上是无限大的障板  发表于 2016-4-18 15:56

使用道具 TOP

278#
发表于 2016-4-18 15:57:02 | 只看该作者
好像单拿信心系列就是吸收了线阵的概念,属于民用的线阵音箱。

点评

线阵是指高音传输方式是线性音源,和点音源有区别,中低频没区别  发表于 2016-4-18 16:04
单拿没出过线阵  发表于 2016-4-18 16:01

使用道具 TOP

279#
发表于 2016-4-18 16:23:58 | 只看该作者
江先生看下是不是这款单元http://www.zalytron.com/specs/Audiom15WX.pdf

点评

谢谢你,有这个参考也可以,和这个单元结构一样,只是振膜材料不同,比这个早一期产品。  发表于 2016-4-18 16:33

使用道具 TOP

280#
发表于 2016-4-18 16:25:10 | 只看该作者
如果不是,将具体型号发给我帮忙再找找。

使用道具 TOP

281#
发表于 2016-4-18 16:26:49 | 只看该作者

点评

像是后面这款,不过原参数只能作参考,虽然我的音箱可以封闭箱与倒相箱切换,但以封闭箱为主,所以就把中间导流孔铜网用透明油漆封闭住了,否则会喘气。  发表于 2016-4-18 17:08

使用道具 TOP

282#
发表于 2016-4-18 16:27:49 | 只看该作者
好像是这款!

使用道具 TOP

283#
发表于 2016-4-18 20:29:28 | 只看该作者
unity Horn,有人做过测试,我虽然认为这个结果有点荒谬,但是不妨让大家看个趋势:

Distortion @ 112dB/1M
300 Hz = .477%
600 Hz = .194%
1200 Hz = .386%
2400 Hz = .967%
4800 Hz = 1.5%
Distortion @ 90dB/1M
300 Hz = .078%
600 Hz = .029%
1200 Hz = .062%
2400 Hz = .110%
4800 Hz = .049%

都觉得PA喇叭只是个大声公,其实我觉得能在大声压下还能保持低失真的那叫做真牛X。

使用道具 TOP

284#
发表于 2016-4-18 21:14:08 | 只看该作者
加一对有源低音炮是一个简洁有效的办法

使用道具 TOP

285#
发表于 2016-4-19 05:36:20 | 只看该作者
eeen 发表于 2016-4-18 20:29
unity Horn,有人做过测试,我虽然认为这个结果有点荒谬,但是不妨让大家看个趋势:

Distortion @ 112dB/ ...

正因如此,pa为了大声压下安全,分频点都取得很保守的,而hifi不太考虑下下要大声压,分频尽可能向下取,流畅度,自然度更好。看那些指标没用的,难道pa取代hifi?

使用道具 TOP

286#
发表于 2016-4-19 10:37:19 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Jwang 于 2016-4-19 10:44 编辑
线阵是指高音传输方式是线性音源,和点音源有区别,中低频没区别


线阵,英文为Line source。对高中低都存在的。以Genesis为例。它的高频是由20只高音组成的,不是真正的线阵,而是一种模仿。它的中频侧是一真正的线阵。它的低频也可说是模拟的线阵。



这是他们网站上关于线阵好处的一篇文章

The Line Source Advantage

Nothing has changed in theoretical acoustics since the original book on acoustics by John William Strutt (Lord Raleigh) published in 1877. There are still only two proper ways for a transducer to propagate sound in a room: a point source and a line source. Anything else, or everything in between, is a compromise.

In order for all frequencies of sound from the loudspeaker to reach the listener at exactly the same time, a coherent wave front is important - not just "time-alignment" of drivers. The ideal is either an infinitely small pulsating point or a pulsating line with a size on the order of the room dimension.

Obviously, a long line-source is much easier to mechanize than a tiny point source. The line-source (if long enough), can approximate the ideal, and in doing so, provide sufficient radiating area for dynamically and spatially realistic sound reproduction.

A line source has no vertical dispersion at any frequency. Hence, there is no sound bouncing from either the floor or the ceiling. No deleterious interference from these surfaces is created (as in virtually all other kinds of speakers).

Another advantage of the line source is that the vertical spectral content of music is virtually the same throughout the length of the line source. Hence, the seating height does not matter with this speaker; unlike point source speakers where it is important for the ears to be aligned in relationship with the tweeter.

A third important advantage of a line source is that it attenuates at -3dB with a doubling of distance whereas a point source attenuates at -6dB with a doubling of distance.

For example, for a loudspeaker of average efficiency, say 90dB/watt at 1m, the efficiency of the speaker will be 84dB/watt at 2m for the point source, and 87dB/watt at 2m for the line source (twice as efficient). At 4m, the corresponding efficiencies are 78dB/watt and 84dB/watt, or 4 times more efficient. At 8m, the point source will be 72dB/watt and 81dB/watt. The line source advantage grows logarithmically with larger distances.

For large loudspeakers, since we generally have a seating position between 4m to 6m away, the line source will be 4 times to 6 times more efficient. In real world terms, this translates into:

The line source loudspeaker sounds more at ease, more relaxed and effortless using the same amplifier power.Since amplifier efficiency is the square of the power, a point source will need an amplifier 16 times more powerful to achieve the same result.
Because less power is needed at any listening level, the line source is more dynamic and rock music has more energy and vibrance.
At normal listening distance and sound level, there is much greater detail and transparency due to the much greater efficiency of the line source.
Since small changes in distance result in much smaller changes in perceived loudness, the sweet spot is much larger, accommodating a whole family on a couch instead of a solo listener.
At normal listening distance, the line source system will play much louder without distortion (from either the amplifier or the drivers).

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册

x

使用道具 TOP

287#
发表于 2016-4-19 11:35:41 | 只看该作者
线阵音箱的单元应该用专门的单元吧!

使用道具 TOP

288#
发表于 2016-4-19 11:53:22 | 只看该作者
musicmad 发表于 2016-4-19 11:35
线阵音箱的单元应该用专门的单元吧!

单元无需特制。任何事都是有好有坏的。模拟线阵有它的好处,但由于所有的单元都是发同一信号,这样会导致声波相互作用。

使用道具 TOP

极品人生 ( 粤ICP备08007514号)

GMT+8, 2024-7-3 05:03, Processed in 0.086110 second(s), 20 queries.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.