楼主，“南瓜”是什么声音风格？多少钱？另外，您的器材架是美国的“Roomtune”吧，表现怎么样？

楼主，“南瓜”是什么声音风格？多少钱？另外，您的器材架是美国的“Roomtune”吧，表现怎么样？
jockey 发表于 2010-10-8 08:14

这个不是我的器材，请南瓜的用家具体来说，他们更有发言权

不知Nagra CDC和ARC CD8比如何，二手的CDC价格应和全新CD8接近吧！
2m873 发表于 2010-10-8 00:57

我更喜欢CDC一些

CDC 更精致而有文化品味, CD8 则更平衡大气,带有美式风格.

不知Nagra CDC和ARC CD8比如何，二手的CDC价格应和全新CD8接近吧！
2m873 发表于 2010-10-8 00:57

若想系统声音更内敛，有品位，选CDC；
反之，声音不够开扬和宽松，选CD8好了。
以上两款CD都是十万以内很好的选择。

再补充一点：系统染色相对多一点的选CDC会取得更好的平衡度。

CDP vs. CD7

The difference in price between the Nagra CDP and Audio Research Reference CD7 ($8995) could buy you a very good CD player. Still, as flagship models from two well-known makers, they compete for the attention of audiophiles, and I doubt the price difference would faze a buyer looking in the five-figure range. They both use the Philips CD Pro2 mechanism, and they both have single-ended and balanced outputs, although the CD7 is fully balanced from its laser to its XLR outputs. Heck, even the latitude of ARC's home in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Nagra's Cheseaux, Switzerland headquarters is similar, so the two players are practically related.

Well, not really. The Reference CD7 is roughly twice the size of the CDP and it uses tubes -- seven 6H30s -- borrowing the output stage of Audio Research's Reference 3 preamp. In many ways, the sonic differences between the CDP and Reference CD7 come down to the traditional differences between tube and solid-state electronics. The CD7 is all about physicality and in-the-listening-room presence. Like a high-quality analog front-end, it fleshes out musicians and singers in an obvious way. You can hear this throughout the musical spectrum -- from the mids, which have the sort of presence that audiophiles adore, to the bass, which has tubey weight and bloom. The CDP, in contrast, floats images amidst a highly illuminated soundstage in which you can practically see the air molecules. The CD7's soundstage, like that of all Audio Research Reference products I've heard, is huge in all dimensions, but it lacks the arid crispness the CDP conjures.

I've commented on how the sound of the Nagra CDP resembles that of ECM recordings. Well, the Audio Research Reference CD7, then, is the sonic manifestation of Telarc -- big and palpable, more about weight and presence than air, speed and precision. If the Nagra CDP represents the science of CD playback, then the Audio Research Reference CD7 represents the art. I can't imagine a listener will fall in love with the sound of one of these players and then jilt it for the other.


by  soundstage.com

刚好我也在考虑，找评论，很巧看到这篇，虽然型号有些小差异——ls的大意就是，nagra的空气，速度，精准更好，arc的重量和存在感更好。

是广州的吗？我一直以为是深圳的厂家。
M211的素质比SN3008高，这两东西我都在用。
M211加SN3008之后 ...
167 发表于 2010-10-7 19:10

请教167兄，天进的M211和MELODY的AUDIXUN AN211相比，哪款的表现更好些？分别有什么特点？

请教167兄，天进的M211和MELODY的AUDIXUN AN211相比，哪款的表现更好些？分别有什么特点？
wm711130 发表于 2010-10-8 20:55

天进M211的分析力、质感、驱动力都更好，我更喜欢，特别是它的驱动力更好，能搭配更多的音箱。
麦利迪的声音比较内敛温柔，解析力算是不错，但是稍逊于M211，驱动力也差一些，虽然标称功率更大。可能需要搭配灵敏度更高的音箱才行。
选哪个还是要看个人喜好。
不过，麦利迪的外观大多数人都会喜欢，而且价格也低几千块。

我用300B单端推
光明圣骑 发表于 2010-10-7 13:28

什么音箱这么好推啊？
什么300B这么厉害啊？

好奇

水蝎星没想象的难推。
DIY的300B，制作成本不便宜。西电300B 274A都用上了。大动态来时是没法听，但听音乐能有几次听大动态的，接上300B后就很难再接受石机的声音，那质感，那丰满度，那不食人间烟火的声音让人陶醉，不会再去在乎低音解释力差一点，不够狠，动态不理想等缺陷了。