极品人生

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
极品人生 主讨论区 器材讨论 › 查看主题

66630

查看

280

回复
返回列表
楼主: hqhsgame

73#
发表于 2018-1-11 04:44:26 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Jwang 于 2018-1-11 04:46 编辑

实际上,原来的珍尼西施的设计者都不在了。现在的设计者和老板是不是能保持原有喇叭并发扬光大是有问题的。这是英文有关这公司的一些历史。供参考。故我的建议是能买到原来的旧版更好。

On June 6, as we traveled back from HE 2006, we received near simultaneous press releases from Genesis Advanced Technologies and Arnie Nudell describing the same event.
From Nudell: "Arnie Nudell, co-founder of Infinity Systems and founder of Genesis Technologies, announces his resignation from Genesis Advanced Technologies, effective immediately.

"Nudell comments, 'After 3½ years acting as chief scientist of GAT, it became apparent that there existed fundamental disagreements with president Gary Koh concerning the marketing direction and future product development of the company.' Further from Nudell, 'It's clear to me that there have been many new directions in our industry and therefore, advancements in product design need to be developed in order to succeed in this new marketplace. I'm ready to pursue those new avenues vigorously.'

"Mr. Nudell wishes Gary Koh and Genesis Advanced Technologies great success in their future endeavors.

"Lastly from Nudell, 'In the near future I will be involved in developing high-end products for a new venture in conjunction with a few other industry heavyweights. My first love is creating state-of-the-art loudspeaker systems, which I will be pursuing in this new venture.'"

From Genesis Advanced Technologies: "After a collaboration of 3½ years, Genesis Advanced Technologies and chief scientist Arnie Nudell have agreed to part ways.

"President & CEO Gary Leonard Koh cites fundamental disagreements in loudspeaker design and company direction resulting in the mutual decision made in May, 'The high-end loudspeaker market is experiencing many different forces right now and we need to move in different directions for the success of the company. It was just time for both of us to move on.'

"Both Mr. Koh and Mr. Nudell wish each other well. Gary adds, 'Arnie and I may not agree on the direction for Genesis Advanced Technologies, but I wish him success in his future endeavors.'"

Nudell is considered one of the high-end's luminaries, having designed (with Cary Christie) the Infinity Servo-Statik 1 loudspeaker (the first loudspeaker this writer ever heard that convinced him there was a musician in the room), the Infinity IRS Beta, the Infinity IRS V, and the Infinity RS-1B—all contenders for Loudspeaker Hall of Fame honors.

Genesis was formed in 1991 by Canadian loudspeaker mega-corporation API. Arnie Nudell and Paul McGowan purchased the company from API in 1994, and Polk acquired an interest in the firm in 1997. A different set of investors held the company from 1998 until its bankruptcy in 2001. In August 2002, Genesis Advanced Technologies was created by Gary Leonard Koh, and GAT acquired Genesis' assets, including its inventory and intellectual property.

We reached Nudell for comment, but he's staying mum until he has solid news to announce, which, he promises, will be "any day now." Koh told us that GAT will continue to manufacture high-quality loudspeakers and will be announcing new products for its line in the near future. Stereophile favorably reviewed the Nudell-designed Genesis 5.2 loudspeaker in February 2006.


Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/news ... a2UXga1jQxGPpCI4.99

使用道具 TOP

74#
发表于 2018-1-11 09:45:02 | 只看该作者
说些个人的实际感受:
我家里听音室是25个平方,折腾装修了四五次了。公司里有两个房间可以听音,一个48平方,一个96平方(建筑面积)。同样一套系统,反而是越大房间越放的开,只要音量能开起来,声音的能量感、清晰度与规模感完虐小房间!低频也是大房间反而多过小房间!

使用道具 TOP

75#
发表于 2018-1-11 10:27:20 | 只看该作者
这篇帖子看着很是过瘾呐,学到很多知识,以后会因此少走很多弯路,像贵丰海神号和惠威 Swans2.3应该也是走的线阵的路子吧?请教Y兄,像您说的那些HIEND级的线阵是我等小烧经济难以承受的,像我现在在玩JBL4429如果往线阵方向升级,有没有哪些价格平易近人却又有着不错效果的系统可以选择?

使用道具 TOP

76#
发表于 2018-1-11 11:20:29 | 只看该作者
大家给楼主推荐的大喇叭都是好东西,各有特色。有三点提醒楼主注意,一是要明确自己平时主要聆听的音乐类型,不必太过照顾上门烧友的口味。二是选箱前必须先确定大房的布局,如果喇叭中高音发声点距皇帝位距离达不到6米的话,谨慎选择大型线阵箱和号角箱为好。三是百万元级箱最好亲耳听过再买。

点评

你这三点高度概括,我也一直在权衡这几点。现在选择的纠结点也来源于这三点。1,听的杂,什么都想听,突来兴致喜欢什么就听什么。2,房间的空间选择也是可变的,独立影院+独立听音室,面积都是大小可调。3,听过满意  发表于 2018-1-11 14:43

使用道具 TOP

77#
发表于 2018-1-11 11:52:20 | 只看该作者

这个帖子越看越有娱乐性了。
音乐厅现场的小提琴独奏不也是点声源吗?
你们不是在观众席距离小提琴20多米远仍听的津津乐道吗,为何玩音响5米听音距离就被吓得尿尿呢?
100平方与40平方听音室有何不同?不正是100平方的房间更像音乐厅声音多一点吗?呵呵。


点评

琴弦应该是线震动吧?不知道可否这么理解  发表于 2018-1-11 14:44

使用道具 TOP

78#
发表于 2018-1-11 11:58:24 | 只看该作者
y1531234567 发表于 2018-1-11 00:08
你用线阵听听小提琴奏鸣曲就很易说明问题的,线阵的结像才是最准确的,一把细小提琴,一台大的钢琴,清晰 ...

请问做混音的主监听(不大懂)箱似乎还是点声源模式的音箱多,也就是说线阵的重放效果客观上可能已经超出了唱片制作时制作者的预设了?

使用道具 TOP

79#
发表于 2018-1-11 12:12:32 | 只看该作者
小舞台 发表于 2018-1-11 11:52
这个帖子越看越有娱乐性了。
音乐厅现场的小提琴独奏不也是点声源吗?
你们不是在观众席距离小提琴2 ...


这个问题提得太好了...值得探讨 ,但估计与现场的声能密度和音响系统声能密度差异的缘由。

使用道具 TOP

80#
发表于 2018-1-11 12:16:30 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 vvvb 于 2018-1-11 12:19 编辑
小舞台 发表于 2018-1-11 11:52
这个帖子越看越有娱乐性了。
音乐厅现场的小提琴独奏不也是点声源吗?
你们不是在观众席距离小提琴2 ...


实际的发声体现场发声和通过一定既有方式记录下发声体(外加空间反射等)的声音信息再通过一定既有方式播放出来的过程应该是两回事。也就是说耳朵接受真实声音和接受力图还原真实声音的设备发声,原理和过程都不等同。

使用道具 TOP

81#
发表于 2018-1-11 13:36:19 | 只看该作者
y1531234567 发表于 2018-1-11 12:49
你把监听和家庭重放搞混了,人家studio是严格声学装修,耳机,近场监听,中场监听几种手段,而且昤听距 ...

您可能没看清我的问题,我没说家庭会按混音监听去布置啊,我是问线阵的重放效果客观上可能超出了唱片制作者的策划的“原貌”(即他们从点声源的主监听中听到的)了,对么?

使用道具 TOP

82#
发表于 2018-1-11 13:48:46 | 只看该作者
外行人好奇问下,声波的传输方式有点状波和柱状波之分吗?这两个名次有出处根据吗?

另外在jdbbs看到y153网友的众多名言,好像自己用几十个喇叭单元在diy喇叭的,不知道测试设备是?是否已经diy成功?

使用道具 TOP

83#
发表于 2018-1-11 13:59:01 | 只看该作者
我问的是你一直说的点状波和柱状波这两个名词出处是? 我物理不好,只能百度,就看到说声波分纵波和横波,声波的传输方式也没看到这两个名称。另外声波的传输方式有点状和柱状吗?

朋友发了一张你上传到某论坛你的diy喇叭和环境给我看,呵呵,我觉得理论多名词多还是挺牛逼的

使用道具 TOP

84#
发表于 2018-1-11 14:11:29 | 只看该作者
jogo 发表于 2018-1-11 13:59
我问的是你一直说的点状波和柱状波这两个名词出处是? 我物理不好,只能百度,就看到说声波分纵波和横波, ...

y153的“点状波、柱状波”确实让人看的云里雾里,而且声波在介质中的传输特性,是需要科学实验和建模分析的……

使用道具 TOP

极品人生 ( 粤ICP备08007514号)

GMT+8, 2024-11-27 19:03, Processed in 0.030525 second(s), 17 queries.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.